Click to go to the Victoria University of Wellington website.
  UTDC Home Page    
About UTDC Events Feedback Resources Research PHELT Cert Tutors Blackboard
         
 
 

Research-Led Teaching And Learning At VUW Discussion Paper

Prof. Tom Angelo (Director, University Teaching Development Centre)
Dr. Christine Asmar (Research Development Coordinator, Office of Research and Postgraduate Studies)

Note: This site presents the discussion paper in web format. You can also download a PDF version for printing from the link on the left.

VUW's Strategic Plan 2005-2015 emphasises the need to focus our energies and resources on initiatives which can effectively and successfully highlight Victoria's distinctive teaching and research capabilities. A challenge facing most research universities is how to link research and teaching, and in this context VUW has been working on its own 'Research-Led Teaching' initiative. In this paper we propose bringing learning into that equation, by way of a new strategic initiative we call Research-led Learning & Teaching (RLT). We see this initiative as critical to developing the 'productive nexus' between research, teaching and learning in order to enhance the quality and effectiveness of all three in ways which will distinguish VUW both nationally and internationally. Enhanced research productivity in PBRF terms is another anticipated outcome.

In order to recognise, evaluate and reward Research-led Learning & Teaching (RLT) Ð as well as to develop a national and international leadership profile in this area Ð Victoria University's academic staff and managers need definitions, models, and examples of RLT. To that end, we researched and developed the draft frameworks and model proposed in this paper, and have begun to gather 'case studies' of good RLT practice already occurring within VUW (see Appendices).

Three distinct approaches to linking teaching and research are found in the higher education literature. We see potential synergies between these three approaches while recognising the distinctions among them:

  • A traditional approach, often known as Research-led Teaching (or research-informed, or research-based teaching) in which academics share their own disciplinary research with students, and teach them disciplinary research methods. This approach can enhance student learning, including the development of graduate attributes, and lead to increased student enrolments and completions in graduate research programmes.
  • A related but perhaps less common approach is Inquiry-based Learning, whereby academics actively involve their undergraduate students in carrying out disciplinary research. This approach is widely practised in North America, where it is known as 'undergraduate research', and increasingly adopted elsewhere. Like RLT, this approach can enhance student learning, including the development of graduate attributes, and lead to increased student enrolments and completions in graduate research programmes. Since presentations and publications with undergraduate students as co-authors can result, this approach can also lead to increased PBRF productivity.
  • A third approach, Research on Teaching and Learning, is one element of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning (SoTL) paradigm developed by Ernest Boyer and the Carnegie Foundation. In this approach Ð which is also known as 'pedagogical research' or 'action research' - academics themselves (involving students when possible) engage in applied research on teaching and learning in their disciplines. Research outputs such as articles in discipline-specific teaching journals often ensue. In addition to bringing about all the outcomes mentioned in relation to the previous two approaches, this approach contributes directly to enhanced teaching effectiveness.

We propose interweaving these three approaches Ð Research-led Teaching, Inquiry-based Learning, and Research on Teaching and Learning Ð into one distinctive, VUW model, which we call Research-led Learning & Teaching (RLT). The model is represented graphically below. We feel that encouraging this three-dimensional approach will increase the number of pathways for Victoria's staff and students to engage actively and productively in research that informs and improves teaching Ð and in teaching that generates new directions for research. A number of individual staff at VUW are already practising RLT in creative and scholarly ways (see the case studies linked from this page). We hope to see an increase in that number.

With input and support from SMT and Academic Board we aim to systematically raise awareness and generate discussion of this proposed RLT model across the University. A session on RLT has already been incorporated into VUW's Orientation programme for new academic staff. In May, we plan to publish a special edition of the UTDC's Spectrum newsletter and will run a workshop on RLT. Already advertised as part of a broader 2005 research skills development project, the May workshop will address practical ways in which VUW staff might engage in and document evidence of RLT in order to apply for University-wide RLT awards to be set up later this year. Twenty-two staff have already signed up to attend this workshop, signifying a high level of interest within the VUW community. We have also discussed with Jude Urlich how best to publicise the RLT project across VUW.

In terms of our own, related scholarly activity, we co-presented a well-received paper on international approaches to academic development for RLT at the first conference of the International Society for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning (ISSoTL) at the University of Indiana-Bloomington in November 2004. More recently, we have had a paper on RLT accepted for the Higher Education Research and Development Society of Australasia (HERDSA) annual conference, at the University of Sydney in July 2005.

The paper will define what might constitute meaningful evidence of effective RLT and describe what VUW is doing to enhance and develop RLT. Responses from peers at this large international conference will directly inform VUW's own strategies for developing and rewarding the effective practice of RLT. In the longer term, an important strategy for developing widespread staff awareness of and engagement in the practice of RLT at VUW will be UTDC's new Postgraduate Certificate in Higher Education Learning and Teaching.

We look forward to the response of our colleagues at Victoria to this paper and to the suggested model attached.


Click on image to view larger version

28 April 2005